Call for Emergency General Meeting 2022 ESFS (2024)

Borys Sydiuk

  • All Messages By This Member

#50


For immediate release

Dear ESFS board

The algorithm we expected from the board and GM of ESFS

1.Call an EGM (emergency general meeting to be run online) to review the questions about formal excluding Russia and Belarus from the list of ESFS members until the war is over taking into consideration the principle of zero-tolerance of any aggression European nations follow.

2.Nominations accepted from Russia and Belarus to be subject to investigation if any of the nominees supports the Russian invasion of Ukraine. If so it should lead to immediate disqualification of such nominees.

3.Accepted and non-disqualified nominations should go under ESFS nominations or a sponsoring country, not Russia or Belarus using Olympic principle – Olympic flag, sponsoring country flag, not embargoed country flag.

4.These should be voted during the EGM.

5.If EGM is not possible, pp 1 to 4 should be discussed at the first at the scheduled first ESFS General business meeting in Luxembourg.

6.In the case Russia and Belarus remain in ESFS member list and/or Russian and Belarusian nominations will go as Russian and Belarusian, not under ESFS or a sponsoring country title, after EGM or the first General business meeting in Luxembourg, Ukraine officially quits ESFS and withdraws all Ukrainian nominations for ESFS 2022 Awards. In this case Ukrainian delegates or their proxy representatives will not take part in the second business meeting, ESFS Award voting and any further ESFS activities until the war is over.

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

Carol Connolly

  • All Messages By This Member

#51


Boris, can you expand on 3 - what do you mean by "flag"? There are no flags used for any countries for the ESFS awards, only the written name of the nominating country (and if it differs, the written name of the country of the nominee, like when Ireland nominationed the UK's Ian McDonald)

toggle quoted messageShow quoted text


On Tue 29 Mar 2022, 17:43 Borys Sydiuk, <master@...> wrote:

For immediate release

Dear ESFS board

The algorithm we expected from the board and GM of ESFS

1.Call an EGM (emergency general meeting to be run online) to review the questions about formal excluding Russia and Belarus from the list of ESFS members until the war is over taking into consideration the principle of zero-tolerance of any aggression European nations follow.

2.Nominations accepted from Russia and Belarus to be subject to investigation if any of the nominees supports the Russian invasion of Ukraine. If so it should lead to immediate disqualification of such nominees.

3.Accepted and non-disqualified nominations should go under ESFS nominations or a sponsoring country, not Russia or Belarus using Olympic principle – Olympic flag, sponsoring country flag, not embargoed country flag.

4.These should be voted during the EGM.

5.If EGM is not possible, pp 1 to 4 should be discussed at the first at the scheduled first ESFS General business meeting in Luxembourg.

6.In the case Russia and Belarus remain in ESFS member list and/or Russian and Belarusian nominations will go as Russian and Belarusian, not under ESFS or a sponsoring country title, after EGM or the first General business meeting in Luxembourg, Ukraine officially quits ESFS and withdraws all Ukrainian nominations for ESFS 2022 Awards. In this case Ukrainian delegates or their proxy representatives will not take part in the second business meeting, ESFS Award voting and any further ESFS activities until the war is over.

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

Borys Sydiuk

  • All Messages By This Member

#52


Hello Carol,

Flag is a conditional definition. I mean no Russia or Belarus should be sounded in the context of ESFS Awards.

toggle quoted messageShow quoted text

Boris, can you expand on 3 - what do you mean by "flag"? There are no flags used for any countries for the ESFS awards, only the written name of the nominating country (and if it differs, the written name of the country of the nominee, like when Ireland nominationed the UK's Ian McDonald)

On Tue 29 Mar 2022, 17:43 Borys Sydiuk, <master@...> wrote:

For immediate release

Dear ESFS board

The algorithm we expected from the board and GM of ESFS

1.Call an EGM (emergency general meeting to be run online) to review the questions about formal excluding Russia and Belarus from the list of ESFS members until the war is over taking into consideration the principle of zero-tolerance of any aggression European nations follow.

2.Nominations accepted from Russia and Belarus to be subject to investigation if any of the nominees supports the Russian invasion of Ukraine. If so it should lead to immediate disqualification of such nominees.

3.Accepted and non-disqualified nominations should go under ESFS nominations or a sponsoring country, not Russia or Belarus using Olympic principle – Olympic flag, sponsoring country flag, not embargoed country flag.

4.These should be voted during the EGM.

5.If EGM is not possible, pp 1 to 4 should be discussed at the first at the scheduled first ESFS General business meeting in Luxembourg.

6.In the case Russia and Belarus remain in ESFS member list and/or Russian and Belarusian nominations will go as Russian and Belarusian, not under ESFS or a sponsoring country title, after EGM or the first General business meeting in Luxembourg, Ukraine officially quits ESFS and withdraws all Ukrainian nominations for ESFS 2022 Awards. In this case Ukrainian delegates or their proxy representatives will not take part in the second business meeting, ESFS Award voting and any further ESFS activities until the war is over.

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

Borys Sydiuk

  • All Messages By This Member

#53


Hello Carol,

Yes, it is like Ukraine nominated Olga Onoiko, it is what I call sponsoring country nomination

toggle quoted messageShow quoted text

Boris, can you expand on 3 - what do you mean by "flag"? There are no flags used for any countries for the ESFS awards, only the written name of the nominating country (and if it differs, the written name of the country of the nominee, like when Ireland nominationed the UK's Ian McDonald)

On Tue 29 Mar 2022, 17:43 Borys Sydiuk, <master@...> wrote:

For immediate release

Dear ESFS board

The algorithm we expected from the board and GM of ESFS

1.Call an EGM (emergency general meeting to be run online) to review the questions about formal excluding Russia and Belarus from the list of ESFS members until the war is over taking into consideration the principle of zero-tolerance of any aggression European nations follow.

2.Nominations accepted from Russia and Belarus to be subject to investigation if any of the nominees supports the Russian invasion of Ukraine. If so it should lead to immediate disqualification of such nominees.

3.Accepted and non-disqualified nominations should go under ESFS nominations or a sponsoring country, not Russia or Belarus using Olympic principle – Olympic flag, sponsoring country flag, not embargoed country flag.

4.These should be voted during the EGM.

5.If EGM is not possible, pp 1 to 4 should be discussed at the first at the scheduled first ESFS General business meeting in Luxembourg.

6.In the case Russia and Belarus remain in ESFS member list and/or Russian and Belarusian nominations will go as Russian and Belarusian, not under ESFS or a sponsoring country title, after EGM or the first General business meeting in Luxembourg, Ukraine officially quits ESFS and withdraws all Ukrainian nominations for ESFS 2022 Awards. In this case Ukrainian delegates or their proxy representatives will not take part in the second business meeting, ESFS Award voting and any further ESFS activities until the war is over.

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

Borys Sydiuk

  • All Messages By This Member

#54


Hello Carol,

And Yes, if a nominee was nominated by R or B it should farther go as ESFS nominee

toggle quoted messageShow quoted text

Boris, can you expand on 3 - what do you mean by "flag"? There are no flags used for any countries for the ESFS awards, only the written name of the nominating country (and if it differs, the written name of the country of the nominee, like when Ireland nominationed the UK's Ian McDonald)

On Tue 29 Mar 2022, 17:43 Borys Sydiuk, <master@...> wrote:

For immediate release

Dear ESFS board

The algorithm we expected from the board and GM of ESFS

1.Call an EGM (emergency general meeting to be run online) to review the questions about formal excluding Russia and Belarus from the list of ESFS members until the war is over taking into consideration the principle of zero-tolerance of any aggression European nations follow.

2.Nominations accepted from Russia and Belarus to be subject to investigation if any of the nominees supports the Russian invasion of Ukraine. If so it should lead to immediate disqualification of such nominees.

3.Accepted and non-disqualified nominations should go under ESFS nominations or a sponsoring country, not Russia or Belarus using Olympic principle – Olympic flag, sponsoring country flag, not embargoed country flag.

4.These should be voted during the EGM.

5.If EGM is not possible, pp 1 to 4 should be discussed at the first at the scheduled first ESFS General business meeting in Luxembourg.

6.In the case Russia and Belarus remain in ESFS member list and/or Russian and Belarusian nominations will go as Russian and Belarusian, not under ESFS or a sponsoring country title, after EGM or the first General business meeting in Luxembourg, Ukraine officially quits ESFS and withdraws all Ukrainian nominations for ESFS 2022 Awards. In this case Ukrainian delegates or their proxy representatives will not take part in the second business meeting, ESFS Award voting and any further ESFS activities until the war is over.

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

Carol Connolly

  • All Messages By This Member

#55


Ah, so let's say next year Ireland nominated a John Smith for Best Artist, and then Ireland was excluded for some reason, the idea is that the website would no longer say "John Smith - Ireland", it would say "John Smith - ESFS"?

Once excluded, do you propose that the next year would delegates from the excluded county be allowed to nominate for their country (but it would instead say ESFS against their nominees) or is your idea that the replacement by ESFS is a once-off and in future the excluded country could not make nominations?

What is your proposed process for re-inclusion? Would it be a vote at a Eurocon?


toggle quoted messageShow quoted text

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 6:56 PM Borys Sydiuk <master@...> wrote:

Hello Carol,

And Yes, if a nominee was nominated by R or B it should farther go as ESFS nominee

Boris, can you expand on 3 - what do you mean by "flag"? There are no flags used for any countries for the ESFS awards, only the written name of the nominating country (and if it differs, the written name of the country of the nominee, like when Ireland nominationed the UK's Ian McDonald)

On Tue 29 Mar 2022, 17:43 Borys Sydiuk, <master@...> wrote:

For immediate release

Dear ESFS board

The algorithm we expected from the board and GM of ESFS

1.Call an EGM (emergency general meeting to be run online) to review the questions about formal excluding Russia and Belarus from the list of ESFS members until the war is over taking into consideration the principle of zero-tolerance of any aggression European nations follow.

2.Nominations accepted from Russia and Belarus to be subject to investigation if any of the nominees supports the Russian invasion of Ukraine. If so it should lead to immediate disqualification of such nominees.

3.Accepted and non-disqualified nominations should go under ESFS nominations or a sponsoring country, not Russia or Belarus using Olympic principle – Olympic flag, sponsoring country flag, not embargoed country flag.

4.These should be voted during the EGM.

5.If EGM is not possible, pp 1 to 4 should be discussed at the first at the scheduled first ESFS General business meeting in Luxembourg.

6.In the case Russia and Belarus remain in ESFS member list and/or Russian and Belarusian nominations will go as Russian and Belarusian, not under ESFS or a sponsoring country title, after EGM or the first General business meeting in Luxembourg, Ukraine officially quits ESFS and withdraws all Ukrainian nominations for ESFS 2022 Awards. In this case Ukrainian delegates or their proxy representatives will not take part in the second business meeting, ESFS Award voting and any further ESFS activities until the war is over.

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

Ben Roimola

  • All Messages By This Member

#56


Dear all,

First of all I do not represent any country or organisation, only my self, so I don’t know if I really have any say in this matter.

But anyway, I really sincerely hope that ESFS will NOT go the Olympic route, as proposed in item number 3. I strongly feel that if a country is excluded from ESFS, this should mean that no one from that country is eligible for any ESFS nominations or awards as long as the country stays excluded from ESFS.

Yours sincerely,

-Ben Roimola-

--

• Who:Ben Roimola, fan of speculativefiction, pinball, movies,Macintosh,swords, dogs...
• Why:What is Time to a Wolf?Happy, happy, joy, joy!
• Sf-news in Swedish:www.enhorningen.net
• Make love – not babies:www.overpopulation.org
• Twitter: @benroimola| @enhorningenzine

toggle quoted messageShow quoted text

On 29. Mar 2022, at 19.43, Borys Sydiuk <master@...> wrote:



For immediate release

Dear ESFS board

The algorithm we expected from the board and GM of ESFS

1.Call an EGM (emergency general meeting to be run online) to review the questions about formal excluding Russia and Belarus from the list of ESFS members until the war is over taking into consideration the principle of zero-tolerance of any aggression European nations follow.

2.Nominations accepted from Russia and Belarus to be subject to investigation if any of the nominees supports the Russian invasion of Ukraine. If so it should lead to immediate disqualification of such nominees.

3.Accepted and non-disqualified nominations should go under ESFS nominations or a sponsoring country, not Russia or Belarus using Olympic principle – Olympic flag, sponsoring country flag, not embargoed country flag.

4.These should be voted during the EGM.

5.If EGM is not possible, pp 1 to 4 should be discussed at the first at the scheduled first ESFS General business meeting in Luxembourg.

6.In the case Russia and Belarus remain in ESFS member list and/or Russian and Belarusian nominations will go as Russian and Belarusian, not under ESFS or a sponsoring country title, after EGM or the first General business meeting in Luxembourg, Ukraine officially quits ESFS and withdraws all Ukrainian nominations for ESFS 2022 Awards. In this case Ukrainian delegates or their proxy representatives will not take part in the second business meeting, ESFS Award voting and any further ESFS activities until the war is over.

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

Carolina Gomez Lagerlöf
  • All Messages By This Member

#57


Hi,

We have read the discussion here in the forum and as the board we want to clarify the following:

We will have a general meeting at Luxcon which is within two weeks.

We will not call for a extraordinary general meeting before then.

The general meeting at Luxcon will be a meeting in person as previously announced.

This matter will be discussed at the general meeting, and the board will announce the agenda and proposals before it.

Best wishes

Carolina with the board of ESFS

Skickades från E-post för Windows

Från: main@ESFS.groups.io <main@ESFS.groups.io> för Ben Roimola <ben.roimola@...>
Skickat: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 8:45:12 PM
Till: main@esfs.groups.io <main@esfs.groups.io>
Ämne: Re: [ESFS] Call for Emergency General Meeting 2022 ESFS

Dear all,

First of all I do not represent any country or organisation, only my self, so I don’t know if I really have any say in this matter.

But anyway, I really sincerely hope that ESFS will NOT go the Olympic route, as proposed in item number 3. I strongly feel that if a country is excluded from ESFS, this should mean that no one from that country is eligible for any ESFS nominations or awards as long as the country stays excluded from ESFS.

Yours sincerely,

-Ben Roimola-


--

• Who:Ben Roimola, fan of speculativefiction, pinball, movies,Macintosh,swords, dogs...
• Why:What is Time to a Wolf?Happy, happy, joy, joy!
• Sf-news in Swedish:www.enhorningen.net
• Make love – not babies:www.overpopulation.org
• Twitter: @benroimola| @enhorningenzine

toggle quoted messageShow quoted text

On 29. Mar 2022, at 19.43, Borys Sydiuk <master@...> wrote:



For immediate release

Dear ESFS board

The algorithm we expected from the board and GM of ESFS

1. Call an EGM (emergency general meeting to be run online) to review the questions about formal excluding Russia and Belarus from the list of ESFS members until the war is over taking into consideration the principle of zero-tolerance of any aggression European nations follow.

2. Nominations accepted from Russia and Belarus to be subject to investigation if any of the nominees supports the Russian invasion of Ukraine. If so it should lead to immediate disqualification of such nominees.

3. Accepted and non-disqualified nominations should go under ESFS nominations or a sponsoring country, not Russia or Belarus using Olympic principle – Olympic flag, sponsoring country flag, not embargoed country flag.

4. These should be voted during the EGM.

5. If EGM is not possible, pp 1 to 4 should be discussed at the first at the scheduled first ESFS General business meeting in Luxembourg.

6. In the case Russia and Belarus remain in ESFS member list and/or Russian and Belarusian nominations will go as Russian and Belarusian, not under ESFS or a sponsoring country title, after EGM or the first General business meeting in Luxembourg, Ukraine officially quits ESFS and withdraws all Ukrainian nominations for ESFS 2022 Awards. In this case Ukrainian delegates or their proxy representatives will not take part in the second business meeting, ESFS Award voting and any further ESFS activities until the war is over.

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

Borys Sydiuk

  • All Messages By This Member

#58


Hello Carol,

Yes, if the war remains. Subject to review after the war.

toggle quoted messageShow quoted text

Ah, so let's say next year Ireland nominated a John Smith for Best Artist, and then Ireland was excluded for some reason, the idea is that the website would no longer say "John Smith - Ireland", it would say "John Smith - ESFS"?

Once excluded, do you propose that the next year would delegates from the excluded county be allowed to nominate for their country (but it would instead say ESFS against their nominees) or is your idea that the replacement by ESFS is a once-off and in future the excluded country could not make nominations?

What is your proposed process for re-inclusion? Would it be a vote at a Eurocon?


On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 6:56 PM Borys Sydiuk <master@...> wrote:

Hello Carol,

And Yes, if a nominee was nominated by R or B it should farther go as ESFS nominee

Boris, can you expand on 3 - what do you mean by "flag"? There are no flags used for any countries for the ESFS awards, only the written name of the nominating country (and if it differs, the written name of the country of the nominee, like when Ireland nominationed the UK's Ian McDonald)

On Tue 29 Mar 2022, 17:43 Borys Sydiuk, <master@...> wrote:

For immediate release

Dear ESFS board

The algorithm we expected from the board and GM of ESFS

1.Call an EGM (emergency general meeting to be run online) to review the questions about formal excluding Russia and Belarus from the list of ESFS members until the war is over taking into consideration the principle of zero-tolerance of any aggression European nations follow.

2.Nominations accepted from Russia and Belarus to be subject to investigation if any of the nominees supports the Russian invasion of Ukraine. If so it should lead to immediate disqualification of such nominees.

3.Accepted and non-disqualified nominations should go under ESFS nominations or a sponsoring country, not Russia or Belarus using Olympic principle – Olympic flag, sponsoring country flag, not embargoed country flag.

4.These should be voted during the EGM.

5.If EGM is not possible, pp 1 to 4 should be discussed at the first at the scheduled first ESFS General business meeting in Luxembourg.

6.In the case Russia and Belarus remain in ESFS member list and/or Russian and Belarusian nominations will go as Russian and Belarusian, not under ESFS or a sponsoring country title, after EGM or the first General business meeting in Luxembourg, Ukraine officially quits ESFS and withdraws all Ukrainian nominations for ESFS 2022 Awards. In this case Ukrainian delegates or their proxy representatives will not take part in the second business meeting, ESFS Award voting and any further ESFS activities until the war is over.

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

Borys Sydiuk

  • All Messages By This Member

#59


Hello Carolina,

That's the minimum Ukraine expects

toggle quoted messageShow quoted text

Hi,

We have read the discussion here in the forum and as the board we want to clarify the following:

We will have a general meeting at Luxcon which is within two weeks.

We will not call for a extraordinary general meeting before then.

The general meeting at Luxcon will be a meeting in person as previously announced.

This matter will be discussed at the general meeting, and the board will announce the agenda and proposals before it.

Best wishes

Carolina with the board of ESFS

Skickades från E-post för Windows

Från: main@ESFS.groups.io <main@ESFS.groups.io> för Ben Roimola <ben.roimola@...>
Skickat: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 8:45:12 PM
Till: main@esfs.groups.io <main@esfs.groups.io>
Ämne: Re: [ESFS] Call for Emergency General Meeting 2022 ESFS

Dear all,

First of all I do not represent any country or organisation, only my self, so I don’t know if I really have any say in this matter.

But anyway, I really sincerely hope that ESFS will NOT go the Olympic route, as proposed in item number 3. I strongly feel that if a country is excluded from ESFS, this should mean that no one from that country is eligible for any ESFS nominations or awards as long as the country stays excluded from ESFS.

Yours sincerely,

-Ben Roimola-


--

• Who:Ben Roimola, fan of speculativefiction, pinball, movies,Macintosh,swords, dogs...
• Why:What is Time to a Wolf?Happy, happy, joy, joy!
• Sf-news in Swedish:www.enhorningen.net
• Make love – not babies:www.overpopulation.org
• Twitter: @benroimola| @enhorningenzine


On 29. Mar 2022, at 19.43, Borys Sydiuk <master@...> wrote:



For immediate release

Dear ESFS board

The algorithm we expected from the board and GM of ESFS

1. Call an EGM (emergency general meeting to be run online) to review the questions about formal excluding Russia and Belarus from the list of ESFS members until the war is over taking into consideration the principle of zero-tolerance of any aggression European nations follow.

2. Nominations accepted from Russia and Belarus to be subject to investigation if any of the nominees supports the Russian invasion of Ukraine. If so it should lead to immediate disqualification of such nominees.

3. Accepted and non-disqualified nominations should go under ESFS nominations or a sponsoring country, not Russia or Belarus using Olympic principle – Olympic flag, sponsoring country flag, not embargoed country flag.

4. These should be voted during the EGM.

5. If EGM is not possible, pp 1 to 4 should be discussed at the first at the scheduled first ESFS General business meeting in Luxembourg.

6. In the case Russia and Belarus remain in ESFS member list and/or Russian and Belarusian nominations will go as Russian and Belarusian, not under ESFS or a sponsoring country title, after EGM or the first General business meeting in Luxembourg, Ukraine officially quits ESFS and withdraws all Ukrainian nominations for ESFS 2022 Awards. In this case Ukrainian delegates or their proxy representatives will not take part in the second business meeting, ESFS Award voting and any further ESFS activities until the war is over.

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

--
Best regards,
Borys mailto:master@...

James Shields (lostcarpark)
  • All Messages By This Member

#60


Hi Borys,

I'm not on the board, and the comments below don't represent any viewpoint other than my own.

On point 1, we are about 10 days out from the AGM, so I think trying to call an EGM now would be difficult, and I doubt it would be possible to get a representative attendance. Should one have been called when the crisis first started? Perhaps, but I could understand if the board thought it was close enough to the AGM that an EGM was not necessary. If anyone thought an EGM was necessary they could have called for one, and if two thirds of the committee were in favour, the board would be required to hold one.

Point 2. I'm unclear whether this refers to nominations of delegates to EGM/AGM or award nominations.

  • For award nominations, I think that trying to vet nominees for their pro-war stance would put too much onus on the board to judge those nominees. I feel that if we decide to ban nominees from a country, then all nominees from that country should be disqualified.
  • For delegates, the current Article 5 of the constitution does not allow delegates to excluded on racial, political or religious grounds.

I think I've covered points 3 and 4 above.

On point 5, I feel that a motion to adopt a mechanism for suspending countries from the ESFS should be scheduled as early as possible in the AGM. Normally such a motion would need to be ratified at the following year's AGM, but I believe that under article 14 a second vote for immediate adoption should be held, which would require a 75% majority.

As mentioned under point 2, I don't believe the society could prevent Russian or Belarusian delegates from taking part in this motion, but once it was adopted, they would not be eligible to vote on further statute changes or awards, and their award nominations would be excluded from the award voting.

greta

  • All Messages By This Member

#61


Hello to all
I am Greta Tamosiunaite, and I have represented Estonia at ESFS meetings on several occasions.

1. Since so little time remains to Eurocon, I think it is reasonable to discuss the points made by Borys at the general meeting.
However, I assume the Ukrainian delegation will not be able to attend themeeting physically. Will Ukrainian delegatesbe given an opportunity to present their case via online conferencing facilities (e.g. Zoom)?

2. I believe this solution to be quite time-consuming and thus impractical. Also, considering the political situation in Belarus and Russia I believe it also to be quite dangerous to openly distance oneself from Putin's politics. I thus propose that for the time being NONE of the Russian and Belarusian nominees and nominations will be considered.

3. For the time beingRussian and Belarusian delegates should not have the privilege of voting at ESFS business meetings

I believe that it is very important for ESFS to send a clear signal that such an aggression on behalf of Russia and Belarus against Ukraine is not tolerated in any form.

Yours,
Greta Tamosiunaite



toggle quoted messageShow quoted text

On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 15:20, lostcarpark <james@...> wrote:

Hi Borys,

I'm not on the board, and the comments below don't represent any viewpoint other than my own.

On point 1, we are about 10 days out from the AGM, so I think trying to call an EGM now would be difficult, and I doubt it would be possible to get a representative attendance. Should one have been called when the crisis first started? Perhaps, but I could understand if the board thought it was close enough to the AGM that an EGM was not necessary. If anyone thought an EGM was necessary they could have called for one, and if two thirds of the committee were in favour, the board would be required to hold one.

Point 2. I'm unclear whether this refers to nominations of delegates to EGM/AGM or award nominations.

  • For award nominations, I think that trying to vet nominees for their pro-war stance would put too much onus on the board to judge those nominees. I feel that if we decide to ban nominees from a country, then all nominees from that country should be disqualified.
  • For delegates, the current Article 5 of the constitution does not allow delegates to excluded on racial, political or religious grounds.

I think I've covered points 3 and 4 above.

On point 5, I feel that a motion to adopt a mechanism for suspending countries from the ESFS should be scheduled as early as possible in the AGM. Normally such a motion would need to be ratified at the following year's AGM, but I believe that under article 14 a second vote for immediate adoption should be held, which would require a 75% majority.

As mentioned under point 2, I don't believe the society could prevent Russian or Belarusian delegates from taking part in this motion, but once it was adopted, they would not be eligible to vote on further statute changes or awards, and their award nominations would be excluded from the award voting.

Call for Emergency General Meeting 2022 ESFS (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ms. Lucile Johns

Last Updated:

Views: 6577

Rating: 4 / 5 (41 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ms. Lucile Johns

Birthday: 1999-11-16

Address: Suite 237 56046 Walsh Coves, West Enid, VT 46557

Phone: +59115435987187

Job: Education Supervisor

Hobby: Genealogy, Stone skipping, Skydiving, Nordic skating, Couponing, Coloring, Gardening

Introduction: My name is Ms. Lucile Johns, I am a successful, friendly, friendly, homely, adventurous, handsome, delightful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.